Source: Health Impact News
INFANTICIDE: 4,739 Dead Babies in VAERS Following COVID-19 Shots Injected Into Pregnant and Child-Bearing Aged Women
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) now reports that there have been at least 4,739 fetal deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccines given to pregnant and child-bearing women. (Source.)
I write “at least” because there is no demographic in VAERS that lists fetal deaths, and I had to develop a special search of the database to find as many as I could, but it is very likely that there are many more fetal deaths than the ones I found.
To find fetal deaths recorded in VAERS I tested several different searches on listed “symptoms” and then looked to see if the search results documented fetal deaths.
The following is the current list of “symptoms” in VAERS that reveals fetal deaths that I use:
Aborted pregnancy
Abortion
Abortion complete
Abortion complicated
Abortion early
Abortion incomplete
Abortion induced
Abortion induced incomplete
Abortion late
Abortion missed
Abortion of ectopic pregnancy
Abortion spontaneous
Abortion spontaneous complete
Abortion spontaneous incomplete
Ectopic pregnancy
Ectopic pregnancy termination
Ectopic pregnancy with contraceptive device
Foetal cardiac arrest
Foetal death
Premature baby death
Premature delivery
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
Stillbirth
Using this same search I performed on COVID-19 vaccines to find abortions, stillbirths, and ectopic pregnancies, I searched for all FDA approved non-COVID vaccines for the previous 30+ years, and I found 2,255 reported cases, or about 75 fetal deaths per year following vaccines injected into pregnant women, pre-COVID. (Source. Note that you have to subtract the COVID vaccines that were entered with wrong dates prior to December, 2020, when the COVID shots were given emergency use authorization.)
If we compare this yearly average of 75 fetal deaths following FDA approved vaccines for 30 years with the number of fetal deaths recorded in 2021 following the COVID-19 experimental shots, which is 3,863 fetal deaths in a single year, that is an increase of over 5,000%.
There have been numerous doctors and nurses who have noticed this horrific increase in fetal deaths who have tried to warn the public throughout 2021 and 2022, and we have featured most of them here on Health Impact News.
Dr. Kimberly Biss in Florida went public to announce that not only are they seeing an increase in miscarriages following COVID-19 vaccines, but also an increase in infertility and cervical cancer.
OBGYN Expert Whistleblower Reveals Alarming Spike In Miscarriages & Infertility Since Vax Launch
An alleged leaked email from a “managing nurse” from a hospital in Fresno, California, stated that there has been an increase in stillbirths following the COVID-19 vaccines, and that this trend is expected to continue according to Epoch Times.
Exposed: Leaked Hospital Email Reveals Explosion of Stillbirths
Dr. John Campbell reported on the increase in neonatal deaths in Scotland following COVID shots.
Dr. James Thorp, a board certified OBGYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with over 43 years of obstetrical experience, was interviewed by Dr. Drew Pensky and stated that in the two years following the mRNA COVID vaccines he has seen an “off-the-charts” rise in sudden fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as fetal malformation and even fetal cardiac arrest, among his patients.
🚨 OB/GYN Dr James Thorp Shares the "Off the Charts" Miscarriages & Fetal Abnormalities He Is Seeing
A Toronto-area casket manufacturer reported that for the first time in his 30 years of manufacturing coffins, they had to order more coffins than usual for children in 2022, ordering them in bulk last year, as there had been such a dramatic increase in deaths among children.
Casket Manufacturer: Coffins for Children Ordered in Bulk, 'First Time in Over 30 Years'
Dr. Elizabeth Mumper stated “For a first-trimester woman to get this injection, they have more of a chance of having a miscarriage or stillbirth than if they were to actually take an abortifacient.”
More Lethal Than Abortion Pills: Horrifying Miscarriage Rates With the COVID Injection
An article we published in June of 2022 reported that birth rates around the world were dropping since the COVID-19 vaccines were mass distributed to the public:
Birth Rates Drop Worldwide Following Mass COVID-19 Vaccination in 2021
In May of 2022, we published an article reporting that the FDA had data showing 82% – 97% of pregnant women injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine lost their babies before the FDA authorized the shots:
FDA had Data Showing 82% – 97% of Pregnant Women Injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Lost Their Babies Before Approving the Shots
Here is one of the earlier reports we did on fetal deaths following COVID vaccines in October of 2021, and this video has been viewed by over 2 million people now:
1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots - Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get It
FOIA Reveals Guilty Parties in Pushing COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines on Pregnant Women: HHS/CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
The public has been warned about how dangerous the COVID-19 shots are, especially for pregnant and child-bearing aged women.
But the U.S. Government has still not warned the public, and continues injecting pregnant women with these lethal shots.
Maggie Thorp JD and Jim Thorp MD have just published an explosive report that serves as a criminal indictment for those who have participated in this infanticide, with over 70 footnoted references.
FOIA Reveals Troubling Relationship between HHS/CDC & the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
by Maggie Thorp JD and Jim Thorp MD
America Out Loud
Excerpts:
Imagine this – you’ve just learned you are pregnant. Emotions flood over you. Regardless of any decisions you make concerning the pregnancy, one thing is certain – your life is forever changed in this moment.
Fast forward to your first obstetrical appointment. Waiting nervously to meet your ob-gyn doctor, you make a mental checklist of issues you want to discuss. You presume conversations you are about to have with your doctor will be confidential. You also presume the medical opinions your doctor is about to give will be transparent and honest, in the best interests of you and your baby, and based on your ob-gyn’s independent medical judgment.
Spoiler alert: some conversations you will have with your ob-gyn have been pre-determined – namely, whether you should consent to take the COVID-19 “vaccine” while you are pregnant. Should you refuse your ob-gyn’s recommendation to take the COVID-19 shot, this will likely be recorded in your medical record, potentially shared with governmental officials, and you’ll be asked again to comply in future appointments.1 In what amounts to the ultimate patient betrayal, these pre-arranged COVID-19 “vaccine” discussions are not necessarily the product of your doctor’s independent medical judgment and do not provide informed consent about the known and unknown risks of the shots to both mother and baby. Rather, these conversations are likely fashioned to push the HHS’s/CDC’s pro-COVID-19 “vaccine” narrative, in what seems to be an attempt to capture ob-gyn doctors and their patients across two continents.
ACOG
Meet the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Founded in 1951, ACOG holds itself out as the “premier professional membership organization for obstetricians and gynecologists” and is the leading organization representing physicians and specialists in obstetrical care.2 ACOG is entrenched across two continents – it has more than 60,000 members and is composed of 12 geographic districts made up of 98 sections spanning North, South, and Central America.3
HHS and COVID-19 Community Corps
Next, meet the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). On April 1, 2021, HHS formally announced the launch of a COVID-19 “vaccine” propaganda machine called COVID-19 Community Corps – a vast marketing enterprise which exploited private entities and individuals across the country to push the COVID-19 “vaccines.”4 As part of the COVID-19 Community Corps, HHS awarded billions of federal dollars to recruit what HHS referred to as “trusted community leaders” who could push the “vaccines” within our most private relationships.5 Much like modern-day trojan horses, these “trusted messengers” would be unique in their ability to permeate all facets of private life.6 As HHS explained on its COVID-19 Community Corps announcement page – a page which has now been taken down with even the original URL removed7 – “Research shows that, when making the decision to get vaccinated, people want to hear from people they trust, such as medical professionals, their own family and friends, and leaders in their community.”8 These HHS “trusted messengers” infiltrated every nook and cranny of our personal lives, in ways and areas that traditional advertising dollars simply couldn’t reach.
Along with many other influential nonprofit medical organizations, ACOG jumped on board as a founding member of COVID-19 Community Corps9 – ultimately receiving millions in HHS/CDC grant money10 and later recklessly endorsing COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, even though the clinical trials failed to include pregnant women.
And ACOG is not alone – of approximately 275 organizations listed by HHS as COVID-19 Community Corps founding members, 25 are health and medical organizations.11 Other influential “founding member” medical organizations included the American Medical Association, American Nurses Association, American Medical Women Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics12 – although women and children seem to be at higher risk for some types of COVID-19 “vaccine” injuries.
HHS and COVID-19 Community Corps: Follow the “Communication Science”
Essential to its strategy, HHS sought to identify trusted community leaders, enlist them to join its COVID-19 Community Corps, and then utilize these “trusted sources” to convince those around them to take the COVID-19 “vaccines.”13 According to a December 23, 2020 article published by CBS News, HHS ran “focus groups” to fine-tune its pro-“vaccine” message for what then HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Weber referred to as “the moveable middle.”14 As then, Deputy Assistant Sec. Weber also reportedly noted, “Communication science says you need a messenger who resonates as trusted.”15
The focus was on finding people with not just local, but also uniquely interpersonal influence. As Harvard public health professor Jay Winsten,16 who has advised previous administrations, reportedly explained to CBS News in its December 2020 article, “You want to go for the low-hanging fruit, those that are easiest to pick and harvest.”17 Noting that the focus should be on finding locally influential people to push the vaccines, Winsten added, “People trust their own doctors, their own nurses, their own pastors, their own social networks. That’s very, very different from a distant figure.”18
Indeed, the effort was very different from using a distant figure. The marketing methods utilized by HHS to push the COVID-19 “vaccines” – including the creation of COVID-19 Community Corps – were so vastly different from any other HHS propaganda effort that an article was published in the Journal of Health Communication in April of 2022 detailing the process.19 Featuring now-retired HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Mark Weber as lead author, the article confirms that HHS did, in fact, target interpersonal relationships.20
As Weber and his co-authors explain: “Market research impacted every element of the Campaign from the beginning – from overall strategy to early paid advertising, social media postings, and other mass communication strategies. The need for interpersonal interactions with physicians, ministers, family, and community members was clear from the initial market research conducted in the fall of 2020. While the first phase of the Campaign initially focused on mass media messages, it shifted to more of a trusted messenger, and community orientation, with outreach focused at the community level.”21
Weber’s and his colleagues’ “vaccine” marketing efforts were so successful that, after retiring from HHS, Weber apparently formed his own private company aimed at “Achieving bold goals at the Federal Level”22 – in typical revolving door fashion.
According to Weber and his co-authors, the HHS campaign to push the COVID-19 “vaccines” entered its third phase in 2022 and has evolved into a highly targeted approach using both paid and “earned” media strategies.
As explained in the article, the HHS campaign: “Focuses more on precision marketing to identify subgroups with vaccine hesitancy, working directly with communities and using trusted messengers in those communities to deliver messages without the Federal government being directly involved (even though the information may come from a Federal source).”23
Notably, the article neglects to fully explain – or even recognize – that what HHS engaged in is both deceptive and unethical. This is because HHS used persons and methods targeting trust within interpersonal relationships to push messages that the “vaccines” were safe and effective – but often, government involvement behind the messaging was not fully disclosed. In some instances, as reported by ABC News in a page now removed from the internet, government organizations recruited and paid influential individuals to offer opinions about the safety and/or efficacy of the “vaccines” – as if these were their own independent opinions.24
Near-Perfect Trojan Horses? “Communication Science” Means Access and Influence
Regarding the issue of “trust,” – a pregnant patient’s relationship with her ob-gyn is arguably one of the most intimate and sacred physician-patient relationships in all of medicine. This is not without reason – as one patient and writer notes, “They’re right next to you for the most momentous occasion of your life.”25 Pregnant mothers trust their ob-gyn doctor with the most intimate and sensitive information about their own bodies, their sex lives, and, if pregnant, about the new life growing inside of them. Their ob-gyn is one of the first persons to actually see a mother’s newborn baby, whether reading prenatal images during the pregnancy or during the birthing and delivery process. Some individuals have even reported the development of a non-romantic affection for their ob-gyn that rivals that of the baby’s father in some ways, due to the “complete vulnerability” many women reportedly experience with their gynecological and pregnancy specialists.26 In sum, government capture of ACOG would provide access to and influence over near-perfect “trojan horses” to market the CDC’s pro-vaccine message.
The Ob-Gyn “Trojan Horse”
As for ob-gyn doctors, ACOG’s 60,000 members span two continents, providing tremendous opportunity for access to those who could potentially become “trusted messengers.” In addition, ACOG’s 60,000 members steward one of the most trusted and intimate physician-patient relationships in all of medicine, thus providing tremendous opportunity for wielding influence over the vaccine-hesitant.
The Patient “Trojan Horse”
As for ob-gyn patients, women have been referred to as “A Brand’s Powerhouse.”27 This is not without good reason: marketing studies have shown that women reportedly make a full 90% of all healthcare decisions about their household.28 Convincing women to take the COVID-19 shots was almost a guarantee that they would become pro-COVID-19 “vaccine” messengers within their own families.
Moreover, if the COVID-19 “vaccines” were considered safe enough to administer to pregnant patients (and thereby trans-placentally to their unborn babies) – certainly they were safe enough for everyone. If HHS and CDC could pull off government capture of ACOG, and convince its ob-gyn members to push the shots on their patients, this would be a bonanza for reaching the “vaccine” hesitant – what HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Mark Weber referred to as the “moveable middle.”29
Cooperative Agreements – Government Capture of ACOG
On February 1, 2021, ACOG was awarded the first of what would be three HHS/CDC “Cooperative Agreement” grants made during the pandemic, in which ACOG would receive over $11 million in grant money over coming years.30 But there was a catch. As the name of the grants indicates – documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that ACOG’s receipt of COVID-19 grant money was conditioned on ACOG yielding substantial control over the projects which were to be funded by the grants to the CDC.31 Receipt of the grant money was also contingent on ACOG’s full compliance with CDC guidance on COVID-19 infection and control.32
And on April 23, 2021, the CDC’s guidance on COVID-19 “vaccination” for pregnant individuals was made crystal clear. On that day, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced at a White House COVID-19 briefing that the CDC was now recommending all pregnant individuals should receive the COVID-19 “vaccine.”33
Perhaps unsurprisingly, following the lead of the CDC, on July 30, 2021, ACOG, along with the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), recklessly began endorsing COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,34 even though the clinical trials failed to include pregnant women.
Bound under the terms and conditions of these Cooperative Agreements grants (which ceded control to the CDC for programs involving COVID-19 grant funding), ACOG played right into the hands of the HHS’ strategy to enlist “trusted messengers” to push the COVID shots. As ACOG explains on its website, a pregnant patient’s ob-gyn had the potential for enormous influence: “[P]regnant people need to feel confident in the decision to choose vaccination, and a strong recommendation from their obstetrician-gynecologist could make a meaningful difference for many pregnant people.”35 In this case, ACOG seems to say the quiet part out loud – a recommendation from an ob-gyn could be a game changer for convincing pregnant women to take the COVID-19 “vaccines.” Here, the targets of the experimental “vaccine” campaign would be society’s most vulnerable – pregnant mothers and their unborn babies.
ACOG’s July 30, 2021, announcement strongly recommending COVID-19 “vaccination” in pregnancy was a sharp about-face from ACOG’s previous stance on the issue. Website archives show that for the months of the pandemic preceding July 30, 2021 (Dec. 2020 through July 21, 2021), ACOG’s official recommendation was to allow pregnant women the freedom to choose, stating throughout the first half of 2021: “In the interest of patient autonomy, ACOG recommends that pregnant individuals be free to make their own decision regarding COVID-19 vaccination.”36 Yet, ACOG’s recommendation abruptly changed on July 30, 2021.37 In place of patient autonomy, independent clinical judgment, and informed consent about the known and unknown risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines,” ACOG’s recommendations would now follow CDC’s guidance, announced by CDC director Walensky on April 23, 2021.
The FOIA Request
To learn more about COVID-19 funding received by ACOG during the pandemic, as well as who (and what) might have been behind ACOG’s about-face on July 30, 2021, I made a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to HHS in 2022. My request was simple – it sought only to obtain documents involving the three $11 million “Cooperative Agreement” grants HHS/CDC made to ACOG during the pandemic.38 These grants were listed on a publicly accessible open data source for federal spending, USASPENDING.gov.39 My FOIA request struck gold – triggering 1400+ pages in government databases related to these three “Cooperative Agreements” awarded to ACOG. But my request also struck a nerve – approximately half of the information produced on those 1400+ pages of federal grants was redacted by HHS, ACOG, or both. Although specific program information and details about the grants have been redacted (based upon work-product, attorney-client, trade secret, and other privileges), the FOIA documents disclose the existence of the following grant programs between CDC and ACOG:
“Engaging Women’s Health Care Providers for Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations”40
“Improving Ob/Gyn’s Ability to Support COVID-19 Vaccination, Mental Health, and Social Support”41
An ERR- Emergency Resource Request Tool,” made by a “Requestor” from the CDC and needed by April 30, 2021 (before ACOG began recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant individuals), in which “ACOG will use the $300,000 funding level to support its COVID-19 response efforts, targeting ob-gyns, other women’s health care practitioners, and the patients they serve.”42
A grant in which communications giant APCO Worldwide, a global public health communication vendor,43 “will support three key initiatives within the COVID-19 scope,” including:
Support ACOG in developing a COVID-19 Earned and Social Media Communications Toolkit.44
Conduct “Virtual Training for Members” to promote the COVID-19 communications toolkit, including hosting one 1.5-hour live virtual training session for ACOG members to “be recorded so it can further be amplified and used by other members.”’45
In partnership with ACOG, assist with producing and launching a COVID-19 podcast series, sharing information on the latest COVID-19 recommendation for ACOG members.46
A grant in which ACOG will, by September 29, 2023
“develop one COVID-19 tool kit for District Managers” and
“launch a paid social media campaign targeting areas with low vaccination rates and high vaccination hesitancy.”47
An ERR- Emergency Resource Request Tool,” made by a “Requestor” from the CDC and needed by March 11, 2022, which will “continue and expand upon work being done during Years 1 and 2 of this collaboration. In year 3, ACOG will focus on developing, maintaining, and promoting tools to combat misinformation on COVID-19, which has emerged as a significant barrier to the uptake of vaccination during pregnancy. ACOG will also asses which of their districts and sections are the most in need of additional education and outreach and focus their efforts on those communities.”48
An ERR – Emergency Resource Request Tool, made by a “Requestor” from the CDC and needed by March 11, 2022, for a second PILOT project involving both the American Academy of Pediatrics and ACOG, which notes, “the ACOG-related activities between the two projects are complementary and not duplicative.”49
Even with the significant redactions, the FOIA documents revealed startling information. By the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreements, ACOG must fully comply with all existing and future guidance from the HHS regarding the control and spread of COVID-19.50
Continue reading the full article at America Out Loud.
About the Authors: Maggie Thorp JD and Jim Thorp MD
Maggie Thorp is a commercial litigation attorney and legal writer-commentator whose law practice has involved both corporate bad faith and corporate fraud. She is licensed to practice law in both the State of Florida and State of Illinois, and has practiced in both the Northern and Middle U.S. District Courts of Florida, as well as before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Most recently, she returned to academia to pursue a Master’s Degree at Duke Divinity School just prior to the onset of the pandemic, obtaining her degree in 2022. In addition to the practice of law, Maggie currently writes about the ethical and legal implications of the modern medical-industrial complex, including the widespread corruption of US government and the censorship of free speech.
Dr. Jim Thorp is a Board-Certified Obstetrician Gynecologist and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with over 43 years of obstetrical experience. While serving as a clinician his entire career, he has also been active in clinical research, with approximately 200 publications. Dr. Thorp has seen over 22,800 high-risk pregnancies in the past three years. He has served as a reviewer for major medical journals, has served on the Board of Directors for the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and also served the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology. He served in the United States Air Force as an Obstetrician Gynecologist, having been awarded a Health Professions Scholarship for his medical school education. Dr. Thorp testified in the US Senate under the Bush administration in 2003 for his expertise in treating the fetus as a patient with in-utero therapies. Most recently, Dr. Thorp has focused his research efforts on the COVID-19 pandemic and published several peer-reviewed scientific publications documenting the dangers of the vaccine in women of reproductive age and in pregnancy. His publications demonstrate that the COVID-19 “vaccination” experiment has been one of the greatest disasters in the history of medicine.
Source: The Daily Clout
UK Media Regulator Ofcom Goes After Me, Mark Steyn, For Telling The Truth
May 9, 2023 • by Naomi Wolf
After a 7 Month Investigation into GBNews, OfCom Censures Mark Steyn, me, for accurate info from Pfizer Documents, via 3500 Medical and Scientific Experts, showing Harm to Women and Babies.
Here is UK Media regulator Ofcom’s Orwellian announcement today, censuring Mark Steyn, GBNews and me, after its seven months’ long investigation into my comments on Mark Steyn’s show, in which I correctly presented harms to women and babies that are tabulated in Pfizer’s own internal documents. Ofcom’s conclusion is not that I was wrong — I was right — in warning women, via primary source evidence in Pfizer’s own documents, about damage to their babies, placentas and breast milk, but rather, Ofcom claims that my comments were “harmful” — even though I was telling the truth:
“OFCOM FINDS GB NEWS IN BREACH OF BROADCASTING RULES FOR A SECOND TIME” is the regulator’s headline.
“An Ofcom investigation has today found the Mark Steyn programme, which first aired on GB News on 4 October 2022, in breach of our broadcasting rules.
The programme included an interview between presenter, Mark Steyn, and a guest, Dr Naomi Wolf. During the interview, Naomi Wolf made serious claims about the Covid-19 vaccine, including that its rollout amounted to a pre-meditated crime – “mass murder” – and was comparable to the actions of “doctors in pre-Nazi Germany”. Ofcom received 422 complaints that alleged these comments were “dangerous” and included “misinformation” that went “unopposed”.
It is important to stress that in line with the right to freedom of expression – broadcasters are free to transmit programmes that include controversial and challenging views, including about Covid-19 vaccines or conspiracy theories. However, alongside this editorial freedom, the Broadcasting Code imposes a clear requirement that if such content has the potential to be harmful, the broadcaster must ensure that its audience is adequately protected.
Our investigation concluded that GB News fell short of this requirement by allowing Naomi Wolf to promote a serious conspiracy theory without challenge or context – for example through other contributions in the programme or by the presenter, who appeared to support many of her comments. There was also no scrutiny of the evidence she claimed to hold to support her claims.
We also took into account that the programme presented Naomi Wolf as a figure of authority, with particular knowledge and expertise in the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines. We consider this would have lent credibility to her unchallenged claims. Of particular concern was her significant and alarming claim that “mass murder” was taking place through the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccinations, which she repeated three times.
We found that the comments made by Naomi Wolf had the potential to impact viewers’ decisions about their health and were therefore potentially harmful. Given that GB News did not take adequate steps to protect viewers from this potentially harmful content, we have found the channel in breach of Rule 2.1 of the Broadcasting Code.
This is the second significant breach of the Code recorded against GB News. In light of this, we are requesting that GB News attends a meeting with Ofcom to discuss its approach to compliance.
You can read our decision in full (PDF, 409.1 KB).
Naomi Wolf also appeared on the Mark Steyn programme the following day, and made further claims about Covid-19 vaccines. Her comments were put into context by other views expressed during the programme, and a banner broadcast throughout the segment informed viewers that Naomi Wolf had “faced widespread criticism for Covid research”. Taking this into account, we will not be pursuing these complaints further.
Covid, compliance and freedom of expression
Since March 2020, Ofcom has received over 26,000 complaints about TV and radio coverage relating to the Covid-19 pandemic. Reflecting the weight we place on the right to freedom of expression, the vast majority of these complaints did not raise issues under our rules.
We have opened 11 formal investigations where the content raised serious concerns. Of these cases, we have found nine programmes in breach of our rules, one was found not in breach, while one investigation remains ongoing. Find out more about our broadcast standards work in the Covid-19 pandemic.
Complaints received about GB News to date total 4,560, representing 1.6% of all broadcast complaints made to us during this period. Of these 1,714 related to the Covid-19 pandemic.
After careful assessment, the vast majority of complaints made against GB News have not been pursued.
We have launched four investigations into the channel, and this is the second breach of our broadcasting rules recorded against GB News since it launched in June 2021.
An earlier episode of the Mark Steyn programme broke our rules by presenting a materially misleading interpretation of official data without sufficient challenge or context, risking harm to viewers. Our investigation into Talking Pints with Nigel Farage (23 August 2021) – relating to offensive language – concluded that the programme was not in breach of our rules. We are currently investigating whether Saturday Morning with Esther and Philip broadcast on 11 March 2023 broke our rules requiring news and current affairs to be presented with due impartiality.”
Here is my statement in response:
“As a journalist, I am appalled that Ofcom censured me for primary source evidence directly from Pfizer’s own internal documents released under court order, presented in reports compiled by 3500 medical and scientific experts, including oncologists, radiologists, medical fraud investigators, RNs, biological scientists, and a range of other physicians and clinicians.
The documents contain 1223 fatalities in three months. In two of the reports compiled by our experts, using the Pfizer documents themselves, half of the adverse events, which included fatalities, occurred within 48 hours of the injection.
When it came to unborn babies, the deaths in Pfizer’s own documents include scores of fetuses, some of which Pfizer identified as suffering from ‘transplacental’ exposure to the vaccine.
A baby died after drinking its vaccinated mother’s breast milk; vaccinated mothers’ breast milk was found by Pfizer in its own review to be contaminated and injurious to babies.
Given that Pfizer knew by Feb 2021 the many ways in which its mrna vaccine was killing adults, babies and fetuses, with adverse events ranging from 3 to 1 to 8 to 1 ratios affecting women, and yet did not inform the public, but rather launched intensive campaigns to urge people, including pregnant women, to take this dangerous product, of course it is a mass murder event.
I speak as the granddaughter of a woman who lost nine siblings to the Holocaust.
We have an obligation to speak out against murder in our own communities.
Pfizer is under investigation by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for deceptive practices and for possibly falsifying data. Both of these crimes are abundantly documented in the 500 pages of reports from the Pfizer documents compiled by our experts.
Ofcom should not penalize reporters or news platforms for presenting the truth, especially if that truth is of grave public significance. If Ofcom continues to censor primary source evidence of harms to women and babies from mrna injections, it too has blood on its hands and is an accessory to mass murder.
Of course I will consult my attorney to take action against this damaging censorship and this baseless reputational attack, which is the second one from a national government (the first was from our own White House and CDC) in relation to this important story.
Mark Steyn is a hero for not backing down in bringing facts about harms to pregnancy, fertility, breastfeeding and babies, to women and men in Britain and the rest of the world. These are facts that the UK Government, linked to Ofcom itself, sought and seeks to this day, to keep hidden.
The exposure of danger to the public which Ofcom todays assails, is exactly what real journalism is supposed to do. I will continue to speak out with lifesaving information to help protect women and babies.”
Source: The Daily Clout
Report 69: BOMBSHELL – Pfizer and FDA Knew in Early 2021 That Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Caused Dire Fetal and Infant Risks, Including Death. They Began an Aggressive Campaign to Vaccinate Pregnant Women Anyway.
April 29, 2023 • by Amy Kelly, Program Director of the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project
The batch of Pfizer clinical trial documents released in April 2023 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under court order contains a shocking, eight-page document titled, “Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review.” The data in the Cumulative Review span “…from the time of drug product development to 28-FEB-2021.” A Pfizer employee, Robert T. Maroko, approved the Review on April 20, 2021. (p. 8)
This document is among the most horrifying yet to emerge into public view. It reveals that both Pfizer and the FDA knew by early 2021 that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine, BNT162b2, resulted in horrible damage to fetuses and babies. (Though I arrived at the conclusions in this article on my own from reviewing the document linked here, Sonia Elijah previously covered some of this same material on April 22nd on TrialSiteNews and on April 26th on Substack and Redacted.) Pfizer tabulated:
Adverse events in over 54% of cases of “maternal exposure” to vaccine (248 out of 458). “Maternal exposure” is defined on pp. 1-2 as: “PTs Maternal exposure timing unspecified, Maternal exposure during pregnancy, Maternal exposure before pregnancy, Exposure during pregnancy.” These definitions imply that Pfizer may have been looking at damage to women and babies that could result from intercourse, inhalation, and skin contact prior to pregnancy, as Pfizer defines “exposure” including all three in its protocol (Protocol Amendment 14, https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-protocol.pdf, pp. 213, 246, 398, 431, 575, 607, 751, 783, 918, 948, 1073, 1103, 1226, 1255, 1378, 1406, 1522, 1549, 1663, 1688, 1813, 1836, 1949, 1969, 2081, 2100, 2211, 2228, and 2337.)
Pfizer’s tally of damages to fetuses and babies includes:
“53 reports [or 21% – 53/248] of spontaneous abortion (51)/ abortion (1)/ abortion missed (1) following BNT162b2 vaccination.” (p. 4). A “missed abortion” is “an empty gestational sac, blighted ovum, or a fetus or fetal pole without a heartbeat prior to completion of 20 weeks 0 days gestation.” (https://www.acog.org/practice-management/coding/coding-library/billing-for-interruption-of-early-pregnancy-loss)
Fetal tachycardia (irregular heart rate faster than 180 beats per minute) that required early delivery and hospitalization of the affected newborn for five days. “The clinical outcome of fetal tachycardia was unknown.” (p. 2)
Six premature labor and delivery cases (p. 3) resulting in:
Two newborn deaths. Cause of death for one baby “was cited as extreme prematurity with severe respiratory distress and pneumothorax.” Pfizer stated the other death was due to “premature baby less than 26 weeks and severe respiratory distress and pneumothorax.” Note that newborn pneumothorax is a condition where air leaks out of the lung and collects between the lung and the chest wall.
Newborn severe respiratory distress. (Note: California midwife, Ellen Jasmer, has described exactly this phenomena happening in her practice in a recent DailyClout interview.)
It is not just fetuses and newborn babies that Pfizer calmly noted were being damaged in the company’s internal records. Pfizer also recorded multiple harms to babies through the milk of vaccinated mothers. According to Pfizer in the Cumulative Review, 19% (41/215) of babies in Pfizer’s records exposed to the company’s COVID mRNA vaccine via their mothers’ breast milk were recorded as suffering from 48 different categories of adverse events* (pp. 6-7). These included:
Preferred Term Explanation # of Events Pyrexia Fever 9 Off label use 8 Product use issue 7 Infant irritability 5 Headache 5 Rash 5 Diarrhoea 3 Illness 3 Insomnia 3 Suppressed lactation 3 Breast milk discolouration 2 Infantile vomiting 2 Lethargy 2 Pain 2 Peripheral coldness 2 Urticaria Hives 2 Vomiting 2 Abdominal discomfort 1 Agitation 1 Allergy to vaccine 1 Angioedema An area of swelling of the lower layer of skin and tissue just under the skin or mucous membranes. The swelling may occur in the face, tongue, larynx, abdomen, or arms and legs. Often it is associated with hives, which are swelling within the upper skin. 1 Anxiety 1 Axillary pain 1 Breast pain 1 Breast swelling 1 Chills 1 Cough 1 Crying 1 Dysgeusia Also known as parageusia. A distortion of the sense of taste. 1 Dysphonia Hoarseness, most frequently caused by a problem with a person’s vocal cords or larynx. 1 Eructation Belching. 1 Epistaxis Nosebleeds. 1 Eyelid ptosis Droopy eyelid. 1 Facial paralysis 1 Fatigue 1 Increased appetite 1 Lymphadenopathy Swollen lymph nodes. 1 Myalgia 1 Nausea 1 Paresis 1 Poor feeding infant 1 Poor quality sleep 1
Pruritis
Itchy skin. 1 Restlessness 1 Rhinorrhoea Runny nose. 1 Roseola An infection that can cause a high fever followed by a rash. 1 Skin exfoliation 1 Vision blurred 1
*From Table 2 - Number of Adverse Events Reported
in Infants with ‘Exposure via Lactation’ (pp. 6-7)Some of the babies’ suffering was serious: there were ten “Serious Adverse Events” (SAEs) from “Exposure via Lactation.” The Review outlines six of them (p. 7):
“A 15-month old infant with medical history of vomiting experienced skin exfoliation and infant irritability while being breastfed (latency <7 days). The outcome of the event ‘skin exfoliation’ was not recovered and outcome of event ‘infant irritability’ was unknown. No causality was reported by the physician.”
“A 9-month old infant with a medical history of meningococcal vaccine and no history of allergies, asthma, eczema or anaphylaxis experienced rash and urticaria a day after exposure via lactation. The outcome of the events was ‘resolved’ and event did not happen after the second day. No causality assessment was provided.”
“A day after the mother received vaccination, a baby developed a rash after breastfeeding. At the time of the report, the event was ‘not recovered. [Sic] A causality assessment was not provided.”
“An 8-month old infant experienced angioedema [an area of swelling of the lower layer of skin and tissue just under the skin or mucous membranes] one day after his mother received vaccination. The event was considered non-serious by health authority and the outcome at the time of the report was unknown. No causality was provided.”
“There were 2 cases reporting ‘illness’ after exposure via breast milk’. In the first case, a 6-month old infant developed an unspecified sickness 2 days post mother’s vaccination. The outcome of the event sickness was recovered, and no causality assessment was provided. The second case, a 3-month old infant developed an unspecified illness and required hospitalization for 6 days post exposure via breast milk (>7 days latency). The event outcome was reported as ‘recovering’ and no causality assessment was provided.”
Pfizer’s Summary and Conclusion section of the Cumulative Review states, “The cases reviewed above are indicative of what is in the Pfizer safety database as of 28 February 2021. The sponsor (Pfizer/BioNTech) will continue to monitor and report on all pregnancy exposure and lactation cases. It is important to note that the spontaneous safety database is intended for hypothesis generation and not hypothesis testing.” (p. 7)
Despite Pfizer and the FDA knowing by April 20, 2021, the extent of damage to fetuses and babies, including the fact that fetuses and newborns had died, on April 23, 2021, inexplicably Dr. Rochelle Walensky held a White House press briefing where she recommended pregnant women get vaccinated. (https://www.verywellhealth.com/pregnant-women-covid-vaccine-5092509)
Please read this damning “Pregnancy and Lactation Cumulative Review” below.
Source: Global Research
Turbo Cancer Leukemia: Children From Ages 11 to 21 Are Dying Within Hours or Days of Cancer Diagnosis
New case: 16 year old Kyle Limper
Global Research, May 02, 2023
Philadelphia, PA – 16 year old Kyle Limper died within 24 hours of leukemia diagnosis on April 13, 2023 (click here)
His father, Ken Limper, initially brought his son to urgent care for back pain after Kyle played basketball before taking him to Jefferson Hospital.
“They told me in a couple of days, if he doesn’t get better, to bring him back. Well, in a couple of days he couldn’t even stand up,” the grieving dad said. “He couldn’t even get out of bed and I had to help him up and stand him up, then he fell right back down on the bed.”
Limper was eventually rushed to St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, where doctors said the multi-sport athlete’s organs were shutting down from leukemia. Within 24 hours after he arrived at the hospital, he died. (click here)
Omaha, NE – Kavieriona White, 11 year old girl died two days after leukemia diagnosis, died on Feb. 16, 2023
11 year old Kavieriona died suddenly after being diagnosed with Leukemia just a few days prior (click here)
It started when she was sent home from school with a fever. A few days later she was found unresponsive, rushed to hospital where she was diagnosed with leukemia and she died two days later.
“The blood disease was leukemia. The doctor informed me it was treatable and curable but the main problem was the brain bleeds”
Augusta, GA – Julia Chavez, 13 year old girl died hours after leukemia diagnosis, on Feb. 13, 2023
“A 13-year-old girl from Harlem Middle School in Georgia died hours after she was diagnosed with leukemia when she went to the ER with a headache and ear infection.” (click here)
“she had bleeding in her brain, lungs, stomach’ and throughout her body.”
‘We never knew she had it,’ Jenna told the news outlet. ‘She never had more than a sniffle and she’s never been hospitalized for anything since she was born.’
Vallejo, CA – Evan Fishel, age 21, died 4 days after leukemia diagnosis, on Feb. 10, 2023
VAERS ID: 2228276 – 13 year old girl (non-US) had her 2nd Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, was diagnosed with leukemia 5 days later, died 41 days after 2nd Pfizer jab on March 02, 2022
A 13 year old girl had 2nd Pfizer on Jan.20, 2022, and felt very tired. She previously had headache and dizziness after 1st Pfizer dose.
On Jan.24, 2022 she presented to emergency weak and pale. On Jan.25, 2022 she was diagnosed with B-cell acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). She was hospitalized and died on March 2, 2022 from heart failure, shock and ALL.
Lake Charles, LA – 17 year old Washington Marion High School student Rhyann Green lost her battle with Leukemia on April 22, 2023.
It is unclear how long she had been battling the disease or how rapidly it progressed.
My Take…
I wrote an extensive substack on this topic on March 7, 2023, that wasn’t widely seen or read (click here)
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines deliver LNPs with mRNA to the bone marrow
Leukemia is a broad term for cancers of the body’s blood-forming tissues, including the bone marrow and the lymphatic system. Leukemia usually involves the white blood cells. In people with leukemia, the bone marrow produces an excessive amount of abnormal white blood cells, which don’t function properly (click here).
The fact that Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines deliver a large payload of LNPs filled with mRNA to the bone marrow, is a very serious problem.
The COVID-19 vaccine spike protein is extremely toxic, and once it is expressed in the bone marrow, it may be initiating these extremely rapid leukemias that are fatal within hours or days.
All of these cases should be investigated.
Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications.
Featured image is from Children’s Health Defense
Source: Global Research
High School Students Who Died Suddenly or Unexpectedly After Taking COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. 16 Cases in 2022
Global Research, May 09, 2023
Broken Arrow, OK – 18 year old Trista Martin died suddenly on Nov. 9, 2022 after she took Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab in July and didn’t tell her parents (click here)
Dallas, TX – 18 year old Kayla Rose Lumpkins died suddenly in her sleep on Sep. 9, 2022, 7 months after her COVID-19 booster shot (click here)(click here)
Philippines (Quezon City) – 13 year old boy Biel Elioenai Cruz Tan had 2nd Pfizer dose on Jan. 26, 2022, died suddenly on June 20, 2022 (click here)
Chicago, IL – 17 year old Gwen Casten, daughter of Congressman Sean Casten, died suddenly in her sleep of sudden cardiac arrhythmia on June 13, 2022 (click here)
Brazil – 15 year old boy Danylo Zinneck Nombre had 2nd Pfizer on Oct. 19, 2021, 18 days later developed weakness in legs, blurred vision, diagnosed with Autoimmune Bickerstaff Brainstem Encephalitis (BBE) a rare neurological disease, was 2 months in ICU & died on March 3, 2022 (click here)
Brazil – 18 year old Isabelle Correia G. de Souza received 3rd COVID-19 vaccine dose on Jan.25, 2022, started feeling ill on Feb.2, 2022, was taken to ICU and died on Feb. 21, 2022 (click here)
Philippines – 17 year old boy Shan Costillas had 2nd Moderna dose on Jan.25, 2022, suffered seizures, stroke and died 4 days later on Jan. 29, 2022
Brazil – 16 year old Anite Vitoria Ribeiro Bentivoglio had 2nd Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine on Oct.20, 2021, became ill, fatigue, vomiting, died Jan. 20, 2022 (click here)
Ararangua, Brazil – 13 year old Vanessa Martins Figueiredo had Pfizer vaccine on Nov. 9, 2021, symptoms started 5 days later with vomiting, paralysis, she died on Jan. 10, 2022 (click here)(click here)
Brazil – 18 year old model Valentina Boscardin developed clots and died suddenly after 2 doses of Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab, on Jan. 9, 2022 (click here)
New Jersey – 13 year old boy had 2nd COVID-19 vaccine on June 6 2021, had a cardiac arrest on Dec. 31, 2021 and died on Jan. 4, 2022 (click here)
Japan – 19 year old had two Moderna jabs and Pfizer booster shot taken on July 29, 2022, found dead in bed 3 days later, cause of death: myocarditis
Uganda (Mpigi) – 14 year old boy Jonathan Luyinda was COVID-19 vaccinated with Pfizer without parent’s consent on Feb. 8, 2022, and he died in July 2022 from multiple organ failure, mother is suing govt (click here)
Publications
Japan (Author: Nushida) – 14 year old girl died 2 days after Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab, Dec. 2022 (click here)
USA (Author: Gill) – Two teenage boys died within week of 2nd Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA jab, both died of myocarditis (click here)
My take…
Parents of teenagers who were pressured into getting COVID-19 vaccinated should have this kind of documentation in their legal files.
Some of these cases are starting to disappear from the internet.
These are cases where the time from COVID-19 vaccination to death was relatively short. What we are seeing now in 2023, as my previous substack article detailed, is a tsunami of sudden deaths in COVID-19 vaccinated young people who weren’t recently vaccinated.
And that’s very troubling, because we are now seeing the longer term adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that were never studied.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications.
Featured image is from Dr. Rath Health Foundation
I turned myself into a monster to fight against the monsters of the world
Force-fed delusions from the overseer's hands
Won't swallow a doctrine that denies the truth
Most absorb the sickness, saturated in the vile, immersed
The weak fall quickly to blind conformity, in line
I turned myself into a monster to fight against the monsters of the world
I spared myself the pain they'll suffer when it all finally comes to haunt
The source of the collapse, is what is taught to pity
Portray themselves as victims, they're the antagonists
Dilute to breakdown the ones who resisted with force
Paint their self-defense as acts of aggression to all
I turned myself into a monster to fight against the monsters of the world
I spared myself the pain they'll suffer when it all finally comes to haunt
Surrounded by demons that brand me a devil, each single one thirsts for my blood
Encircled by demons that rush from the shadows, I hold strong and repel their attack
Surrounded by demons that brand me a devil, each single one thirsts for my blood
Encircled by demons that rush from the shadows, I hold strong and repel their attack
No I, I won't submit
No I, I won't relent
I turned myself into a monster to fight against the monsters of the world
I spared myself the pain they'll suffer when it all finally comes to hauntMadness is now what is seen as normal, impulsiveness has been set unchained
So few question what is encouraged, locked inside of the alien's cage
Ways to connect
Telegram: @JoelWalbert
Email: thetruthaddict@tutanota.com
The Truth Addict Telegram channel
Hard Truth Soldier chat on Telegram
Mastodon: @thetruthaddict@noagendasocial.com
Session: 05e7fa1d9e7dcae8512eed0702531272de14a7f1e392591432551a336feb48357c
Odysee: TruthAddict
Donations (#Value4Value)
Buy Me a Coffee (One time donations as low as $1)
Bitcoin:
bc1qe8enf89g667dy890j2lnt637xqlt9wvc9f07un (on chain)
bc1qnqjdudgc0qr5yfrp826nxes8kljf9p07mwt3q3yjrd6gqwj0lqtswmy39s (lightning)
nemesis@getalby.com
joelw@fountain.fm
+wildviolet72C (PayNym)
Monero:
43E8i7Pzv1APDJJPEuNnQAV914RqzbNae15UKKurntVhbeTznmXr1P3GYzK9mMDnVR8C1fd8VRbzEf1iYuL3La3q7pcNmeN
Share this post