There is this in the third (?) piece: "The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, is planning to use insects to deliver genetically engineered **viruses** to crops, with the aim of altering the plant’s genetic traits in the field."
Yea so? What's contagion have to do with something being injected? We have gm crops. We have gm mosquitoes. We have crispr and mRNA. Its gene editing/insertion.
Well, it said it would make "viruses." Viruses (the concept) are associated with contagion. I grasp that the tech is being used unEthically, that We are not given the choice to opt out of Their ghastly and psychopathic plan. But I ponder how They can have any "viruses" to genetically alter.
Just because its not a contagion doesnt mean they can't be used for other means. And to say they don't exist at all is quite disingenuous. They do exist and they can be and are used for all sorts of things like this. The virus debate isnt a simple yes or no and gain of function doesn't necessarily mean what people think it means. Now, does what they are trying actually work yet? That, IMHO, is a big no.
Regarding the last sentence. It can be a synthetic dna/rna fragment. There are the 'giant' viruses (giant obviously being a relative term) that can be isolated and worked with. The immunology/virology concept of virus isnt necessarily the same as the biotech concept. The former is clearly BS. That I know we can and do agree on. But there is more to the story. Like all issues, a false binary forms (the terrain camp is heavily infiltrated by agents, shills and related scum bags as evidenced by the vicious and often coordinated attacks against anyone who doesnt bow to the no-virus stance) people take sides, and the truth always ends up somewhere in the middle. As long as the so-called health freedom movement is busy with all the infighting, nothing will ever be acheived. Like all engineered divides.
As for unethical use, well, that's the duality of biotech. And all tech for that matter. That's why I always include that song lyric I put at the beginning whenever I report on anything biotech.
Okay... How can You weaponize a unicorn? No such thing as "deadly viruses" OR "contagion." So how does that work?
What are you talking about? Its about GM mosquitoes
There is this in the third (?) piece: "The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, is planning to use insects to deliver genetically engineered **viruses** to crops, with the aim of altering the plant’s genetic traits in the field."
Yea so? What's contagion have to do with something being injected? We have gm crops. We have gm mosquitoes. We have crispr and mRNA. Its gene editing/insertion.
Well, it said it would make "viruses." Viruses (the concept) are associated with contagion. I grasp that the tech is being used unEthically, that We are not given the choice to opt out of Their ghastly and psychopathic plan. But I ponder how They can have any "viruses" to genetically alter.
Just because its not a contagion doesnt mean they can't be used for other means. And to say they don't exist at all is quite disingenuous. They do exist and they can be and are used for all sorts of things like this. The virus debate isnt a simple yes or no and gain of function doesn't necessarily mean what people think it means. Now, does what they are trying actually work yet? That, IMHO, is a big no.
No... They do not exist... You might want to take a look at how They "find" viruses.
The Truth About Viruses: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/11/challenging-sars-cov-2/
https://odysee.com/@TruthVault:0/Church-Of-Virology:e
The Origins of COVID-19: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/The-Origins-of-COVID-19:d
Why Pathogens Don't Exist: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Why-Pathogens-Don't-Exist:d
The End of Germ Theory: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8
Hardly disingenuous... Rockefeller lies taught as "truth" in His schools, publishing, and media for profit and fear - for control.
Regarding the last sentence. It can be a synthetic dna/rna fragment. There are the 'giant' viruses (giant obviously being a relative term) that can be isolated and worked with. The immunology/virology concept of virus isnt necessarily the same as the biotech concept. The former is clearly BS. That I know we can and do agree on. But there is more to the story. Like all issues, a false binary forms (the terrain camp is heavily infiltrated by agents, shills and related scum bags as evidenced by the vicious and often coordinated attacks against anyone who doesnt bow to the no-virus stance) people take sides, and the truth always ends up somewhere in the middle. As long as the so-called health freedom movement is busy with all the infighting, nothing will ever be acheived. Like all engineered divides.
As for unethical use, well, that's the duality of biotech. And all tech for that matter. That's why I always include that song lyric I put at the beginning whenever I report on anything biotech.
"Biotechnolgy, ain't what's so bad.
Like all technology, its in the wrong hands"
It's in the moneyed hands of psychopaths.