Your guess is as good as mine. I saw a fresh mask in the street the other day so I would assume the person who dropped it might still. Cult members gonna cult, ya know
How is an “expired” test any less accurate than a test that was never designed to be used as a diagnostic tool in the first place? In other words, THERE NEVER WAS A REAL TEST AS PCR IS NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR ILLNESS and the thing being tested for has never been identified and thus you cant test for the presence of a thing that does not exist. Except in the Matrix...damn, people are gullible beyond comprehension.
I made no statement regarding what you personally are or aren't claiming about anything. I commented on the legitimacy of diagnostic tests that don't exist to determine presence of a presumed infectious agent that has not been identified and thus cannot possibly be determined to be present or causally linked to a set of symptoms in whatever host is being "tested".
Ok well I simply misunderstood you. And you are misunderstanding me. The 'tests' detect something. What they detect is irrelevant for my point. And if the chemicals required for the tests to function properly are degraded, the tests don't function as designed, and very well will be duds. Its got nothing to do with legitimacy of them, or if sars-cov2 exists or not. Its fraud on top of fraud on top of fraud. And since the fraud is getting too much to cover anymore, this seems like a very easy and convenient way to back out of a lost fight yet declare victory simultaneously.
Respectfully tapping out. I have a different understanding of the tests from the person who designed/invented the pcr and what they were intended to be used for. NOT what they were co-opted for...
Keep up the great work and writing Enjoy your stack immensely.
Like I said, you are clearly not understanding my point then. It doesnt matter what they are intended for. We are talking about what they have been mis-used for. That's the entire point of this post and everything I am saying
Cool story but none of that has anything whatsoever to do with my point. The 'tests' detect what they are designed to detect. And for that to work there is a very precise chemical reaction that requires a precise amount of all the chemicals involved. If the chemicals are degraded, the reaction will not happen as intended and return who knows what results. Also, the self testing kits are rapid-antigen tests. not PCR. The PCR 'tests' require a lab to analyze and are rarely used anymore.
This may have changed but I know before 2020 food and medicine were marked as expiring when it was projected to have lost 5% of its effectiveness(or nutritional value). Similarly, you phone/computer battery is 'dead' when it loses 10% of its stored power, because beyond that it starts to 'wobble' and we 'need' steady power. So it's nearly impossible to see degradation in a test if you extend the design life. The irony is that it allows people to not buy a replacement as often. I though planned obsolescence is key to disaster Capitalism; makes me suspicious when we are allowed to forego our next purchase.
This isn't food, medicine, or a battery though. This is a chemical reaction that requires all components to be intact and in precise quantities to function as designed. Some may work, others will be duds, so its just an odd thing to do. And its not about money because they are pushing using some that people already have. If it was all money, they would say the expired are no good so they can sell more.
Wait, wait.....Why is anyone testing for "covid" anymore???????
Your guess is as good as mine. I saw a fresh mask in the street the other day so I would assume the person who dropped it might still. Cult members gonna cult, ya know
How is an “expired” test any less accurate than a test that was never designed to be used as a diagnostic tool in the first place? In other words, THERE NEVER WAS A REAL TEST AS PCR IS NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR ILLNESS and the thing being tested for has never been identified and thus you cant test for the presence of a thing that does not exist. Except in the Matrix...damn, people are gullible beyond comprehension.
Since you seem to think I am claiming sars-cov2 exists, I suggest reading these
https://thetruthaddict.substack.com/p/the-current-thing-lab-leak-confirmed
https://thetruthaddict.substack.com/p/the-virus-is-not-necessarily-the
I made no statement regarding what you personally are or aren't claiming about anything. I commented on the legitimacy of diagnostic tests that don't exist to determine presence of a presumed infectious agent that has not been identified and thus cannot possibly be determined to be present or causally linked to a set of symptoms in whatever host is being "tested".
I read your stack. I'm not disagreeing with you.
Ok well I simply misunderstood you. And you are misunderstanding me. The 'tests' detect something. What they detect is irrelevant for my point. And if the chemicals required for the tests to function properly are degraded, the tests don't function as designed, and very well will be duds. Its got nothing to do with legitimacy of them, or if sars-cov2 exists or not. Its fraud on top of fraud on top of fraud. And since the fraud is getting too much to cover anymore, this seems like a very easy and convenient way to back out of a lost fight yet declare victory simultaneously.
Respectfully tapping out. I have a different understanding of the tests from the person who designed/invented the pcr and what they were intended to be used for. NOT what they were co-opted for...
Keep up the great work and writing Enjoy your stack immensely.
Like I said, you are clearly not understanding my point then. It doesnt matter what they are intended for. We are talking about what they have been mis-used for. That's the entire point of this post and everything I am saying
Cool story but none of that has anything whatsoever to do with my point. The 'tests' detect what they are designed to detect. And for that to work there is a very precise chemical reaction that requires a precise amount of all the chemicals involved. If the chemicals are degraded, the reaction will not happen as intended and return who knows what results. Also, the self testing kits are rapid-antigen tests. not PCR. The PCR 'tests' require a lab to analyze and are rarely used anymore.
This may have changed but I know before 2020 food and medicine were marked as expiring when it was projected to have lost 5% of its effectiveness(or nutritional value). Similarly, you phone/computer battery is 'dead' when it loses 10% of its stored power, because beyond that it starts to 'wobble' and we 'need' steady power. So it's nearly impossible to see degradation in a test if you extend the design life. The irony is that it allows people to not buy a replacement as often. I though planned obsolescence is key to disaster Capitalism; makes me suspicious when we are allowed to forego our next purchase.
This isn't food, medicine, or a battery though. This is a chemical reaction that requires all components to be intact and in precise quantities to function as designed. Some may work, others will be duds, so its just an odd thing to do. And its not about money because they are pushing using some that people already have. If it was all money, they would say the expired are no good so they can sell more.