why would you think I'm unfamiliar with this? I read it the day it was published. And what are they injecting? A bio-weapon. mRNA has nothing to do with traditional vaccines, virus or no virus. Its genetic code designed to enter cells and cause spike protein production,if/when it the LNP package is not degraded, in which case, who know what is happening.
No, actually I just found the link, posted by someone in a different Substack, and I wanted to re-share, as I thought it would be of interest to your readers.
I also read this post which says that in 2020 there was no excess deaths in China, outside Wuhan. Thus.. no pandemic.
they are looking at something so it exists. Can't look at something that doesn't exist. The nuance comes in as to what they are and what they do or don't do, which was beyond the scope of what I was attempting to convey.
It irrelevant to the point of what I was writing. But now that I see what type of terrain proponent you are, I would never expect you to understand nuance. Let me guess, you saw a Kaufman video within the past three year and now you think you know everything about this issue?
If you did half of the research I've done on the subject of vaccines and terrain theory vs germ theory, you would've reached same conclusions as myself.
Let me summarize, for your readers:
1. Germ theory is a hoax. Germs don't cause disease, they proliferate when they find proper terrain in a host (due to stress, toxicity, etc). Remove the cause to solve the issue, no need to fight the germs.
2. Pathogenic viruses don't exist as described. No virus has been proven to cause disease
3. No vaccine is safe and effective in history of vaccines (it comes as consequence of above statements, but evidence abounds for this as well)
4. Big pharma doesn't work for you, but for shareholders. There's a big history of corruption and malfeasance in big pharma, and many of their products do more harm than good
Look, I have been researching this debate for over ten years. Don't for a fucking second talk to me like I don't know what I am talking about. You clearly didn't even know this was a debate until recently, so take your high and mighty know it all attitude elsewhere. I am fucking sick of you fucking annoy Kaufman cultists. All you ever do is parrot what others say, yet have no fucking clue what you are even talking about.
And the fact that your only takeaway from all I wrote here is that I say the issue is nuanced and you have a problem with that, well, pretty clear you do not have the ability to comprehend what I wrote.
You wrote an otherwise REALLY good article and very WELL documented. I only wanted to clarify that there can be no nuances I'm something existing and being the cause of the disease, or not existing and not causing the disease.
But you took this issue to the heart and made a big deal out of it.
Please forgive me if sometimes I like to correct things, it's a character flaw :)
I'm going to continue reading your posts as if this discussion never took place.
All the best, I look forward to reading more of your work!
I can shorten your whole effort at exposing the lie of the germ theory with this:
IF THE GERM THEORY WERE TRUE...NO ONE WOULD BE ALIVE TO BELIEVE IT!
Exosomes are "viruses" in every extent of the word.
hahaha. Yea isnt that actually a quote from someone? Recall a meme early in this mess with that and think it was credited to someone
Statement of virus isolation by Andrew Kaufman
If no virus has been isolated, what are we injecting people with? And why locking them up in their homes?
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
why would you think I'm unfamiliar with this? I read it the day it was published. And what are they injecting? A bio-weapon. mRNA has nothing to do with traditional vaccines, virus or no virus. Its genetic code designed to enter cells and cause spike protein production,if/when it the LNP package is not degraded, in which case, who know what is happening.
I never said you are unfamiliar with this. I posted the link for your readers
Oh my mistake. I thought you were rehashing our previous convo.
No, actually I just found the link, posted by someone in a different Substack, and I wanted to re-share, as I thought it would be of interest to your readers.
I also read this post which says that in 2020 there was no excess deaths in China, outside Wuhan. Thus.. no pandemic.
https://open.substack.com/pub/xochipelli/p/china-the-pandemic-never-existed?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
Yup, what we actually had was a case-demic and premeditated murder in hospitals/elder homes
Look at this.... https://gettr.com/post/p2b6s6v9d81
"personally I think it is more nuanced than a simple yes or no"
Hmmm .. no.. either a thing exists, or it doesn't. It cannot be 'nuanced'
You're gonna have to take a position on it, lapdance isn't going to be enough :)
they are looking at something so it exists. Can't look at something that doesn't exist. The nuance comes in as to what they are and what they do or don't do, which was beyond the scope of what I was attempting to convey.
well yes, they are looking at something. But the question is if that something is what they pretend it is.
And that's why you can't say it's nuanced. It's either a virus, or not (exozome, dead cell debris, etc)
You can't say the truth is nuanced when you're looking at a horse and pretend it's a unicorn..
It irrelevant to the point of what I was writing. But now that I see what type of terrain proponent you are, I would never expect you to understand nuance. Let me guess, you saw a Kaufman video within the past three year and now you think you know everything about this issue?
Kaufman and many others, yes.
If you did half of the research I've done on the subject of vaccines and terrain theory vs germ theory, you would've reached same conclusions as myself.
Let me summarize, for your readers:
1. Germ theory is a hoax. Germs don't cause disease, they proliferate when they find proper terrain in a host (due to stress, toxicity, etc). Remove the cause to solve the issue, no need to fight the germs.
2. Pathogenic viruses don't exist as described. No virus has been proven to cause disease
3. No vaccine is safe and effective in history of vaccines (it comes as consequence of above statements, but evidence abounds for this as well)
4. Big pharma doesn't work for you, but for shareholders. There's a big history of corruption and malfeasance in big pharma, and many of their products do more harm than good
Look, I have been researching this debate for over ten years. Don't for a fucking second talk to me like I don't know what I am talking about. You clearly didn't even know this was a debate until recently, so take your high and mighty know it all attitude elsewhere. I am fucking sick of you fucking annoy Kaufman cultists. All you ever do is parrot what others say, yet have no fucking clue what you are even talking about.
And the fact that your only takeaway from all I wrote here is that I say the issue is nuanced and you have a problem with that, well, pretty clear you do not have the ability to comprehend what I wrote.
No, my only takeaway wasn't that 'nuance'.
You wrote an otherwise REALLY good article and very WELL documented. I only wanted to clarify that there can be no nuances I'm something existing and being the cause of the disease, or not existing and not causing the disease.
But you took this issue to the heart and made a big deal out of it.
Please forgive me if sometimes I like to correct things, it's a character flaw :)
I'm going to continue reading your posts as if this discussion never took place.
All the best, I look forward to reading more of your work!
Oh, geez, grow up, will you..